Austin 2027, for Dell Children’s
I’m running the 2027 Austin Marathon in support of the Dell Children’s Foundation. If following this comeback has been useful or fun, a gift to my fundraiser is the best way to cheer me on to the start line.
The season cycle
Each training block runs about a year and peaks with three benchmark races in the spring, then resets right after the Capital 10K and starts again. The 2027 set is Austin on Feb 14, McKinney on Apr 3 and the Capital 10K on Apr 11.
& repeat
Season benchmarks
The three races are the yardstick. Season over season, the goal is to run them faster.
All-time weekly volume
Every training week since mid-2025, colored by season, with the April reset and the benchmark races marked.
Running only, walks excluded. Hover a bar for the weekly total.
The road to Austin
The plan from here to the start line on February 14, 2027: 19 weeks of building, colored by phase, with the longest run tracked in blue. The goal is sub-4:00 (about 5:41/km).
Swipe the chart sideways to see it all.
The curve climbs in three-week lifts with a cut-back week after each, so load steps back before it steps up again. Volume tops out near 62 km, below last season's 68, which is the right ceiling coming off the layoff. The longest run reaches 32 km twice, the final one three weeks out. Intensity stays light and late: marathon-pace work starts as a finish on the long run in November and never grows past one short session a week, because effort, not mileage, is what the left leg reacts to. The ringed point is the Georgetown Half on Dec 12, run as a dress rehearsal for Austin rather than a race: the first half easy under the heart-rate cap, the second half at goal marathon pace. It replaces that week's long run, and the cut-back week after it absorbs the recovery.
How I actually run
Every run since 2019 sits in Garmin as more than a distance and a time. Pulled apart lap by lap, across 195 runs and 1,544 laps, the watch has been recording a few things about my mechanics that I could not feel. Five of them are worth showing, each with what I am doing about it.
Swipe the chart sideways to see it all.
before the injurysince coming back
For fourteen months I ran at 49.3–49.4% left, which is about as even as a person gets. Since returning from the IT band layoff I am at 47.7%, and correcting for the fact that slower running shifts this a little, I am still roughly 1.4 points short of my own baseline. Over the last 3 weeks it has held flat rather than closing. The knee has read 0/10 for almost all of it, non-zero on two days: worst 4/10 after a 5K time trial, and most recently 2/10 after a strength session, each resolving within a day or two. It has been back to 0/10 for the 36 days since. That mostly quiet record is the point: a limp you cannot feel is still a limp, and the other leg and both hips absorb whatever the left one is not taking. What I do about it: lead every single-leg exercise with the left leg so it is never the tired one, and match the left side's quality rather than counting reps. This number is the thing I check weekly.
Swipe the chart sideways to see it all.
The same warm-up curve shows up in the asymmetry itself. Averaged across the comeback, the left leg carries 47.5% of footstrike time in the first kilometre and climbs to 48.1% by the sixth, moving back toward even as the tissue warms and the pace lifts. On any single long run the swing is larger still. The left side loads better the longer I run, not worse, so the deficit is an early-run, cold-tissue problem rather than fatigue. What I do about it: the same ankle hops and skips that warm the tendons also help the balance, and I keep the first kilometre genuinely easy so the left leg has time to switch on before the load builds.
Swipe the chart sideways to see it all.
Braking at footstrike starts at 8.1% and falls to 4.6% by the sixth kilometre, and this is after a five minute walking warmup. The obvious reading is overstriding, but my own numbers say otherwise: across these laps the kilometres with the longest stride and the lowest cadence are the ones that brake least. What actually predicts it is how far into the run I am. This is cold tendon, not bad form. The Achilles and the plantar fascia are not returning energy yet, so landing force gets absorbed instead of bounced back. What I do about it: three or four minutes of ankle hops, pogo hops and skips before the watch starts, then let the first kilometre be slow instead of chasing pace in it.
These are the same six kilometres measured two ways, and they move in opposite directions: turnover drops from 88.4 to 86.5 steps per minute while each step stretches from 0.86 to 0.94 metres. All the late-run speed comes from reaching further rather than turning over faster. Worth watching, but not worth panicking about, because the braking chart above says those long-stride kilometres are my cleanest. What I do about it: the real limiter on the back half is cardiac, not mechanical, so I hold a heart-rate ceiling of 152 and let the pace fall where it wants to.
Swipe the chart sideways to see it all.
Set against a full year of base training, almost everything has improved: quicker turnover, less time on the ground, less wasted vertical bounce. The engine and the mechanics are both in better shape than they were before I got hurt. One more thing that surprised me: on the day I actually flared the IT band, a hard time trial in August, my form metrics were the best of the entire comeback: 49.65% balance, 89.33 steps per minute, 235 ms on the ground. Technique did not break down. The dose was simply too big, 356 W against about 275 on an easy day. What I do about it: keep the fast work short and well recovered, and stay strict about sustained hard running.
Then and now
The same calendar window, August 10 to October 11, in 2025 and this year. Then: 44 runs at 33.2 km a week. Now: 33 runs at 23.0 km a week, 31% less volume. Form has improved on 4 measures and slipped on 1.
| Measure | 2025 | Now | Change | Read |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volume and frequency | ||||
| Run-block km per week | 33.2 | 23.0 | -31% | |
| Runs per week | 4.9 | 3.7 | -1.2 | |
| Average run, km | 8.5 | 6.3 | -2.3 km | |
| Longest run, km | 21.1 | 11.9 | -9.2 km | |
| Elevation per run, m | 93 | 39 | ||
| Training load per run | n/a | 140 | ||
| Pace and heart rate | ||||
| Average pace, min/km | 6:19 | 6:25 | +6 s/km | worse |
| Average HR, bpm | 146.0 | 144.7 | -1.3 | |
| HR at 6:00 to 6:30/km (lap avg) | 150.2 | 150.3 | +0.2 | |
| HR at 6:30 to 7:00/km (lap avg) | 144.0 | 138.7 | -5.3 | |
| Aerobic training effect | 3.20 | 3.77 | ||
| Running mechanics | ||||
| Cadence, steps/min | 83.6 | 87.6 | +4.0 | better |
| Stride length, cm | 94.9 | 88.9 | -6.0 | |
| Ground contact time, ms | 288 | 254 | -34 | better |
| Vertical oscillation, cm | 8.52 | 7.58 | -0.94 | better |
| Vertical ratio, % | 8.86 | 8.34 | -0.52 | better |
| Braking at footstrike (median lap), % | n/a | 5.62 | ||
| Left-leg share of ground contact, % | 49.22 | 47.42 | -1.79 | worse |
Run-block figures only (walk warm-up and cool-down excluded). Pace and heart rate are weighted by run time. Form measures are run-block averages. Braking uses the median lap and drops instrument-error readings above 20%; it is blank for 2025 because braking was not recorded on laps before late 2025. The HR bands are lap averages for laps in that pace range, shown only where there are at least five laps. Comeback runs averaged 28.6 C at the start; most 2025 runs in this window have no air temperature recorded, so heart-rate comparisons can't be heat-adjusted and should be read with that in mind. Bands are re-derived each generation, not typed in.
This week
Oct 19 to Oct 25, 2026. Pulled from the Garmin calendar, so it is the plan the watch actually has.
Running under the cap
Since September 14, every easy and long run has been governed by a heart-rate ceiling of 152 bpm instead of a pace. Each mark is one kilometre of those runs, 156 kilometres across 21 runs: where it sits shows heart rate and pace, its shape shows whether that kilometre climbed or descended, and its color is the air temperature at the nearest airport weather station (Georgetown at home, Austin when traveling) when I started.
Swipe the chart sideways to see it all.
The cap holds on most flat ground and gives way on the hill. 111 of 136 flat or downhill kilometres finished at or under 152, while 14 of 20 climbing kilometres went over it, averaging 153 bpm. Near the cap, pace on those climbs (6:16/km) is within 2 seconds of pace on the flat (6:14/km): I hold the pace up the hill and let the heart rate take it. That is allowed by design, since the hill is short and the rule is to stay under 164, but it is where the cap does the least governing.
Every run so far started between 8 and 29 C, with dew points of 6–24 C. Already the cooler mornings run 29 seconds per kilometre faster at the same heart rate (5:55 at under 15 C vs 6:24 at 25 C and up). Expect the gold to darken and the marks to rise as it keeps cooling.